WND - Latest Comments in Bill to let chaplains hold biblical view of 'gays'

Re: Bill to let chaplains hold biblical view of 'gays'

LYNN KELLY — Thu, 12 Feb 2015 10:07:21 -0000

IMPEACH THE DEGENERATE PRESIDENT, THEN ARREST HIM AND TRY HIM FOR TREASON. RUSSIA IS A THUG STATE AND AMERICA IS A DEGENERATE STATE. I PERFER THE THUG STATE OVER THE DEGENERATE STATE EVERY TIME AND GOD DOES TOO. RUSSIAN RESISTANCE TO THE AMERICAN DEGENERATE HOMOSEXUAL AGENDA IS THE REAL REASON FOR THE AGGRESSION OF THE UNTIED STATES AGAINST RUSSIA, NOT UKRAINE, MAY RUSSIA WIN

Re: Bill to let chaplains hold biblical view of 'gays'

herald — Sun, 27 Jan 2013 09:27:51 -0000

HA HA says the HOLY ONE, WHO sees, knows, & hears ALL THINGS! A nation cannot be ruled by wisdom, if the intent is to dominate. This ungodly liberal government will reap the harvest of corruption & perversion. Judgement will on their own heads. be noisy for Jesus. HIS NAME is ABOVE ALL names. EVERY KNEE WILL BOW & TONGUE CONFESS that HE IS LORD! :...Free in HIM

Re: Bill to let chaplains hold biblical view of 'gays'

Korruptor — Sat, 07 Apr 2012 23:12:10 -0000

Or BHO is. - National Defense Resources Preparedness 'Act.'

Or you inability to separate party fiction from reality. Oh, lets impeach Bush 1 and 2 for his XOs, but when it's our Democratic president it's perfectly okay. Hypocrite.

And by definition any unconstitutional act by the POTUS is an impeachable offense, and thus clearly treason. Nevermind a violation of the oath you purport BHO took on the Bible, but he never said he has.

Re: Bill to let chaplains hold biblical view of 'gays'

Korruptor — Sat, 07 Apr 2012 23:09:21 -0000

Your inability to understand the legislative process, as separate from the wishes and desires of the sitting POTUS.

Re: Bill to let chaplains hold biblical view of 'gays'

Jacqueleen — Sat, 07 Apr 2012 15:49:28 -0000

He who laughs last, laughs best! LOL

Re: Bill to let chaplains hold biblical view of 'gays'

Calvinius — Fri, 06 Apr 2012 23:59:28 -0000

And you're a moronic lunatic.

Re: Bill to let chaplains hold biblical view of 'gays'

Calvinius — Fri, 06 Apr 2012 23:59:12 -0000

That's not a matter of belief. It's more like an objective fact.

Re: Bill to let chaplains hold biblical view of 'gays'

Calvinius — Fri, 06 Apr 2012 23:58:24 -0000

The greatest sin of Socialism is that it denies God.

Except that it doesn't. Socialism is nothing more than an economic system. It has no bearing on religion. Neither does capitalism, BTW.

The Democrats are Socialists

Wrong again, fly. Nobody with the slightest idea of what socialism actually is would say that. Very few Democrats are socialists.

now look at the Government in power ( globally ) it trashes the Laws of the Land, and creates its own Liberal/Marxist dictatorship

Seek professional help. Immediately.

Re: Bill to let chaplains hold biblical view of 'gays'

Calvinius — Fri, 06 Apr 2012 23:54:34 -0000

But it's interesting and most telling you didn't take umbrage in accusation of your 'Dear Leader' legislating by executive order

That might be because Obama isn't doing that.

a clearly unconstitutional, treasonous, and impeachable offense.

Thus demonstrating that your knowledge of the constitution is just as nonexistent as your knowledge of everything else.

Re: Bill to let chaplains hold biblical view of 'gays'

martinblasperezpinilla — Fri, 06 Apr 2012 16:46:22 -0000

"And Congress can only repeal it if it were passed into law by Congress."
?!?!?!?!?!?!?

DADT: Pub.L. 103-160 (10 U.S.C. § 654)

DADT Repeal Act: H.R. 2965, S. 4023
Passed the House on December 15, 2010 (Yeas: 250; Nays: 175)
Passed the Senate on December 18, 2010 (Yeas: 65; Nays: 31)

What are you hallucinating?

Re: Bill to let chaplains hold biblical view of 'gays'

Korruptor — Fri, 06 Apr 2012 15:52:33 -0000

- "'The president, your president, has no authority to determine the law of the land, only Congress.' YES! Congress repealed DADT."
Take the cotton out of your ears, I've been saying that from the start. And Congress can only repeal it if it were passed into law by Congress.

- "Relevant precedent: "On July 26, 1948, President Truman issued Executive Order 9981 establishing equality of treatment and opportunity in the Armed Services." (Truman Library)"
Still had to go through Congress. And while I'm not specifying that it was DADT that was an XO, there are numerous XOs on record as having the validity of law, outside of the jurisdiction of an immediate disaster or national emergency. Like the National Defense Resources Preparedness Act. It's an XO, how can it be an Act, as brought forth, debated, reconciled, agreed, and signed into law as by Congress. Oh wait, it's not. But if we call it an 'act' then people will be mislead into believing that it has the will and consent of the people.
Just one of many...

Bonus points:
- "wwwDOTfoxnewsDOTcom"
Can be abbreviated 'foxnews com.'

Disqus - Fix your f**ing BBcode

Re: Bill to let chaplains hold biblical view of 'gays'

Korruptor — Fri, 06 Apr 2012 15:38:00 -0000

Hmm, I pretty sure his ability to recite something wasn't the point of contention, but lets roll with it.

As BHO is a Constitutional scholar, is that really your defense?

But it's interesting and most telling you didn't take umbrage in accusation of your 'Dear Leader' legislating by executive order, a clearly unconstitutional, treasonous, and impeachable offense.

Sersiously, priorities a little f**ed-up aren't they?

Re: Bill to let chaplains hold biblical view of 'gays'

Calvinius — Sun, 01 Apr 2012 00:16:09 -0000

It's called the facts, Korruptor. I'm not surprised that you of all people would have a hard time with facts. But Obama did correctly affirm the oath of office. Moron.

Re: Bill to let chaplains hold biblical view of 'gays'

martinblasperezpinilla — Sat, 31 Mar 2012 13:45:28 -0000

"The president, your president, has no authority to determine the law of the land, only Congress."
YES! Congress repealed DADT. Re-quote of you:
"Secondly, the mere concept of legislation by executive order..."
WHAT legislation by executive order? ALLOWING military chaplains perform gay marriages in the military (in states where it is legal) isn't in any sense "legislation by executive order". The Reverend NoGays does not want to marry gays? OK. The Reverend HatefulBigot does not want that ANOTHER chaplain perform gay marriages? NOT OK.

Relevant precedent: "On July 26, 1948, President Truman issued Executive Order 9981 establishing equality of treatment and opportunity in the Armed Services." (Truman Library)

Bonus link:
wwwDOTfoxnewsDOTcom/ politics/2011/12/01/senate-backs-proposal-to-let-military-chaplains-decline-performing-same-sex
Quote: "That proposal, sponsored by Rep. Tim Huelskamp, R-Kan., was aimed at prohibiting chaplains from performing the ceremonies on bases no matter what the state laws say."

Re: Bill to let chaplains hold biblical view of 'gays'

Korruptor — Sat, 31 Mar 2012 13:15:42 -0000

You would be hard pressed to prove that figure as science has already stated there are more people alive today than ever was in all history.

But if you want to do statistics...
Stalin - 43 million (not war casualties)
Mao - 42 million (not war casualties)
Pol Pot - 1.7 million
Khan invasion of China - 41.5 million ≅1200AD
Kims of NKorea - millions

NAmericas, discounted, most died to disease.

Re: Bill to let chaplains hold biblical view of 'gays'

Korruptor — Sat, 31 Mar 2012 12:07:20 -0000

I know you're a f**ing moron, but maybe you should actually read.
I never mentioned the phrase "so help me God." You did. And because you're incapable of critical thought you were unable to properly complete a single sentence.

"DADT - was a law passed by Congress. Only Congress could repeal it." - Me
And you're still so stupid, you are incapable of seeing that's exactly what I said. The president, your president, has no authority to determine the law of the land, only Congress.

Get a f**ing clue.

Re: Bill to let chaplains hold biblical view of 'gays'

Korruptor — Sat, 31 Mar 2012 12:06:37 -0000

I know you're a moron, but maybe you should actually read.
I never mentioned the phrase "so help me God." You did. And because you're incapable of critical thought you were unable to properly complete a single sentence.

Get a clue.

Re: Bill to let chaplains hold biblical view of 'gays'

martinblasperezpinilla — Sat, 31 Mar 2012 10:35:33 -0000

"... he never disclosed what he took his oath..."
IRRELEVANT. READ the Constitution. First Amendment, No Religious Clause Test, "So help me God" isn't.

"DADT - was a law passed by Congress. Only Congress could repeal it. It may have come from the conception of the POTUS, but that does not mean s/he has determinative control over the Uniform Code of Military Justice or laws of war. All binding laws properly originate with Congress."
DADT was repealed by the Congress, genius! Art. 125 of UCMJ: irrelevant since Lawrence v. Texas.

Re: Bill to let chaplains hold biblical view of 'gays'

Korruptor — Sat, 31 Mar 2012 09:17:44 -0000

As a Constitutional law professor, is that really your defense for BHOs inability to correctly affirm the oath of office? Pretty weak.

Re: Bill to let chaplains hold biblical view of 'gays'

Korruptor — Sat, 31 Mar 2012 08:59:15 -0000

You're too stupid to realize 'on God knows what.' Obvious conclusion to be drawn, clearly far to esoteric for the likes of you. Despite BHOs constant claims of Christianity, he never disclosed what he took his oath on, in private, and his actions certainly disprove him.

DADT - was a law passed by Congress. Only Congress could repeal it. It may have come from the conception of the POTUS, but that does not mean s/he has determinative control over the Uniform Code of Military Justice or laws of war. All binding laws properly originate with Congress.

Re: Bill to let chaplains hold biblical view of 'gays'

martinblasperezpinilla — Wed, 21 Mar 2012 03:13:36 -0000

"Please don't waste my time with your blathering."
Translation: "I can't answer because all is true". Your disgusting "Holy" book says NOTHING against the slavery.

Re: Bill to let chaplains hold biblical view of 'gays'

luxtexente — Tue, 20 Mar 2012 19:17:58 -0000

Please don't waste my time with your blathering. Your hatred of God and His word is annoying and not worth any more of my time or effort.

Re: Bill to let chaplains hold biblical view of 'gays'

JeromeMac — Tue, 20 Mar 2012 09:59:39 -0000

Why do chaplains get more free speech rights than the average soldier, anyway? They think because they are chaplains they can force their beliefs on others. Can I go around as a soldier and tell everyone that Christianity is absurd religious dogma and superstition and not face any threat of punishment? I really don't care what chaplains believe.

Re: Bill to let chaplains hold biblical view of 'gays'

NUTN2SAY — Tue, 20 Mar 2012 08:12:59 -0000

Not worthy of reply! Too stupid!

Re: Bill to let chaplains hold biblical view of 'gays'

mustang — Tue, 20 Mar 2012 04:26:19 -0000

Wait a minute...the arm of flesh? Are you saying that only democrats, socialists, and liberals have flesh on their arms?