<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>WND - Latest Comments in GOP legally barred from fighting vote fraud</title><link>http://wnd-news.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://wnd-news.disqus.com/gop_legally_barred_from_fighting_vote_fraud_81/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Sep 2019 20:32:32 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: GOP legally barred from fighting vote fraud</title><link>http://mobile.wnd.com/2012/11/gop-legally-barred-from-fighting-vote-fraud/#comment-4616209638</link><description>&lt;p&gt;End of 1982 Consent Decree: GOP finally can contest vote fraud after 36 years&lt;br&gt;August 12, 2018August 8, 2018 by IWB&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Did you know that since 1982, the Republican Party had been legally prohibited from contesting elections due to suspected vote fraud, because of a legal agreement called the Consent Decree the GOP made with the Democrat Party?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.investmentwatchblog.com/end-of-1982-consent-decree-gop-finally-can-contest-vote-fraud-after-36-years/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.investmentwatchblog.com/end-of-1982-consent-decree-gop-finally-can-contest-vote-fraud-after-36-years/"&gt;http://www.investmentwatchb...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; District Judge Dickinson R. Debevoise, who, even after he retired, returned every year for the sole purpose of renewing his 1982 order for another year. Debevoise died in August 2015.&lt;br&gt;In 2010, the RNC appealed “to vacate or modify” the Consent Decreein “Democratic National Committee v Republican National Committee,” Case No. 09-4615 (C.A. 3, Mar. 8, 2012). But an appeals judge at the New Jersey District Court, Obama appointee Judge Joseph Greenaway, Jr., declined to vacate the decree.&lt;br&gt;Judge Vazquez, an Obama appointee, ended that noxious 1982 Consent Decree legal agreement between the RNC and DNC which had tied the Republican Party’s hands from contesting elections and investigating vote fraud for 36 years&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Eleanor Cummings</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 14 Sep 2019 20:32:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: GOP legally barred from fighting vote fraud</title><link>http://mobile.wnd.com/2012/11/gop-legally-barred-from-fighting-vote-fraud/#comment-3055480358</link><description>&lt;p&gt;One thing is clear - there will always only be two parties.  If we keep splintering the "conservative" party, we are weakening the party as a whole.  You do not see the liberals splintering.  When push comes to shove, a democrat will ALWAYS, ALWAYS fall in line and vote with their party - not so for the stupid republicans!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Let us FIX what is wrong with the Republican party, clean house, sweep out the vermin.  And to do that, we must go to the states that keep electing spineless RINOS.  And when we DO get a conservative elected, and that conservative goes over to the dark side, RECALL THEM immediately.  Better yet, since the repubs are so good at honoring those Consents, like the one on the voting fraud, make each one sign a Consent with we, the people, before we allow them to even run, let alone elect them!!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">IrateTexan</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2016 13:13:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: GOP legally barred from fighting vote fraud</title><link>http://mobile.wnd.com/2012/11/gop-legally-barred-from-fighting-vote-fraud/#comment-2986218359</link><description>&lt;p&gt;They were targeting election fraud in Black neighborhoods for the same reason Law Enforcement targets Black neighborhoods for policing violent crime:  Black Inner City culture of criminality.  Those are facts, not cherry picked nonsense for your Democrat Thought Plantation.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Regular Guy</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 05 Nov 2016 11:19:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: GOP legally barred from fighting vote fraud</title><link>http://mobile.wnd.com/2012/11/gop-legally-barred-from-fighting-vote-fraud/#comment-2971066493</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Uhm the decree is race  based because it is only blacks being targeted for so called fraud. White woman -- white WORKING women, are the deciding vote for  Hillary, not blacks.  Yet no raids or over sight is occurring in WHITE areas.  Why aren't poll sitters in the suburbs?  Its modern Day Jim Crow!   The sentiment is also racist at it's core.  Black people just be stealin' all kinds of stuff, even elections.  Can't trust them thar negroes. Deplorable 100 percent! FYI Bush spent millions of dollars and 5 years trying to find examples of voter fraud. Found not even one credible sample. Sorry if facts hurt your conspiracy theory dance.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alicia Norman</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2016 03:10:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: GOP legally barred from fighting vote fraud</title><link>http://mobile.wnd.com/2012/11/gop-legally-barred-from-fighting-vote-fraud/#comment-2828399662</link><description>&lt;p&gt;there are some laws that should be broken and this is one of them.  if the GOP stands by and doesn't challenge this 'law' then they are the bunch of wienies I think that they are.  But then, it should be us to demand that they challenge it or they will continue to think all is ok with such a unlawful 'law'.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I am going to print it out and whenever I am at one of those Republican presentations - I am going to bring it up until they are sick of me.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rnot</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2016 09:43:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: GOP legally barred from fighting vote fraud</title><link>http://mobile.wnd.com/2012/11/gop-legally-barred-from-fighting-vote-fraud/#comment-2823450739</link><description>&lt;p&gt;ARE YOU SERIOUS?.. THE DEM PARTY IS THE MOST CORRUPT PARTY IN THIS COUNTRY AND YOU SAY THAT.  WOW STUPIDITY RUNS DEEP IN THE DEM PARTY AND YOU ARE A GOOD EXAMPLE OF THAT!!!  LETS GET RID OF THE DEMS AND THE DEM PARTY OF KILLARY AND PEDOPHILE BILL AND MURDERS  ( ANOTHER PERSON CURIOUSLY COMMITTED SUICIDE TODAY THAT ARE CONNECTED TO KILLARY AND BILL)   AND OF OBAMA THE FRAUD PRES.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Beeta</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 06 Aug 2016 00:23:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: GOP legally barred from fighting vote fraud</title><link>http://mobile.wnd.com/2012/11/gop-legally-barred-from-fighting-vote-fraud/#comment-2823447107</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I THINK THE FRAUD COMES IN THE MACHINES THAT ARE SET TO DEFAULT TO THE DEM CANDIDATE OR THE PLACE THE VOTES ARE COUNTED. OBAMA NOW HAS OUR VOTES COUNTED IN FRANCE BY A COMPANY RELATED TO SOROS.. WHAT IS WRONG WITH AMERICA COUNTING ITS OWN VOTES.. WE CAN COUNT!  HOLY COW.. JUST ANOTHER WAY TO COMMIT FRAUD AND DESTROY OUR NATION THROUGH DISENFRANCHISING THE AMERICAN VOTERS. IF OBAMA CAN DESTROY IT HE WILL .  IF IT CAN DESTROY AMERICA OBAMA HAS TRIED IT OR DONE IT.. GOD HELP US.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Beeta</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 06 Aug 2016 00:18:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: GOP legally barred from fighting vote fraud</title><link>http://mobile.wnd.com/2012/11/gop-legally-barred-from-fighting-vote-fraud/#comment-2823442454</link><description>&lt;p&gt;IT IS THE WHITE PEOPLE THAT ARE BEING DISENFRANCHISED.  IT EVERYONE'S RIGHT TO VOTE NO MATTER THE COLOR. A VOTER ID SHOULD BE REQUIRED. EVERYONE HAS AN ID. YOU HAVE TO USE ONE FOR A MYRIAD OF REASONS. IT IS BS TO THINK THAT THERE ARE SOME PEOPLE THAT ARE LEGAL  TO VOTE THAT DO NOT HAVE AN ID. IT IS THE DEMS EXCUSE SO VOTER FRAUD CAN BE COMMITED BY THE SAME PEOPLE VOTING MULTIPLE TIMES AND IN DIFFERENT STATES.. THIS IS DISENFRANCHISING MY VOTE .  IT CANCELS OUT MY VOTE AND OTHERS BY THEM VOTING MULTIPLE TIMES.  THIS SHOULD BE STOPPED . IT IS A DEMOCRAP THING TO HAMSTRING THE REPUBS. AND THEY KNOW IT.. THEY KNOW A GOOD THING WHEN THEY SEE IT.. FRAUD IS FRAUD AND THE DEMS HAVE PERFECTED IT.  THE REPUBS WANT FAIRNESS IN THE ELECTIONS BY VOTER ID. THAT WAY NO ONE VOTES MORE THAN ONCE AND EVERY PERSONS VOTE COUNTS..  THE DEMS DO NOT WANT THAT SO THEY CAN VOTE MULTIPLE TIMES.. REPUBS...GET OUT THERE AND VOTE AND VOTE OFTEN..IF THE DEMS CAN DO IT SO CAN WE.. VOTE OVER AND OVER AND OVER.. TIME ABOUT IS FAIR PLAY. TWO CAN PLAY THAT GAME..&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Beeta</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 06 Aug 2016 00:13:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: GOP legally barred from fighting vote fraud</title><link>http://mobile.wnd.com/2012/11/gop-legally-barred-from-fighting-vote-fraud/#comment-2823434632</link><description>&lt;p&gt;***. IT IS THE DEMS THAT COMMIT VOTER FRAUD BUT BRINGING IN BUS LOADS OF PEOPLE FROM ONE STATE TO THE OTHER TO VOTE IN THE ELECTIONS.. THEY DO NOT HAVE TO HAVE ID SO THEY CAN VOTE AS MANY TIMES AS THEY WANT. ALSO THE MACHINES ARE CONTROLED BY THE DEMS AND SOROS WHICH IS FRAUD AS THEY DEFAULT TO WHAT EVER DEM CANDIDATE IS RUNNING.  THIS WAS REPORTED OVER AND OVER AND OVER AND NOTHING WAS DONE. THIS BS NEEDS TO BE STOPPED. IT WILL BE WORSE THIS YEAR BECAUSE THE DEMOCRAPS ARE THE BIGGEST THIEVES AND LIARS AND COMMIT MORE FRAUD THAT ANY PARTY.. THEY HAVE NO MORALS AND WILL DO ANYTHING TO STEAL THE ELECTION.  THEY HAVE DONE IT FOR YEARS.  OBAMA WAS A FRAUD. BUSH WON THE  ELECTION FAIR AND SQUARE.   THE DEMS WERE MAD BECAUSE THEIR FRAUD DID NOT WORK.. YES WE CAN EXPECT KILLARY TO BE DOING WHAT SHE DOES BEST.. COMMIT FRAUD ALONG WITH HER COHORTS!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Beeta</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 06 Aug 2016 00:03:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: GOP legally barred from fighting vote fraud</title><link>http://mobile.wnd.com/2012/11/gop-legally-barred-from-fighting-vote-fraud/#comment-2602689400</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Tells you how spineless the Republicans are if they refuse to challenge it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">JohnMc</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 Apr 2016 15:32:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: GOP legally barred from fighting vote fraud</title><link>http://mobile.wnd.com/2012/11/gop-legally-barred-from-fighting-vote-fraud/#comment-2496284683</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Agreed.  This is another example of country club republicans running from a fight before the first punch.  That is why I register as a conservative or as in the case now Constitutional Party.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Neil Ringlee</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2016 14:55:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: GOP legally barred from fighting vote fraud</title><link>http://mobile.wnd.com/2012/11/gop-legally-barred-from-fighting-vote-fraud/#comment-2453387122</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Seems the GOP preemptively surrendered decades ago. I heard of this before, though not the details.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Porphyry</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2016 08:44:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: GOP legally barred from fighting vote fraud</title><link>http://mobile.wnd.com/2012/11/gop-legally-barred-from-fighting-vote-fraud/#comment-1902198746</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This is total BS.  This article does not even report the facts and is stale as it was authored in 2012. This stems from a 1982 agreement and was heard in 2012. If there is evidence of fraud then the vote can be challenged.  I am a conservative through and through but I have become embarrassed by this type of rhetoric.  We are beginning to look like a bunch of fools and our commentators are becoming no better than MSNBC.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chad J. Legg</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2015 18:26:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: GOP legally barred from fighting vote fraud</title><link>http://mobile.wnd.com/2012/11/gop-legally-barred-from-fighting-vote-fraud/#comment-1891800790</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Send this issue to Texas.  We will take it to court and so far we don't lose!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TxPatriot</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2015 10:57:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: GOP legally barred from fighting vote fraud</title><link>http://mobile.wnd.com/2012/11/gop-legally-barred-from-fighting-vote-fraud/#comment-1405211999</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Like everything else now a day, it is a one way street, his way or no way. The Rep. can not make sure the demonuts  are doing things legally,&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Concerned Citizen</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2014 15:14:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: GOP legally barred from fighting vote fraud</title><link>http://mobile.wnd.com/2012/11/gop-legally-barred-from-fighting-vote-fraud/#comment-1332124732</link><description>&lt;p&gt;IS the Judge still alive? IF not HIS order die's with him. Born 1924!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Lew</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2014 13:45:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: GOP legally barred from fighting vote fraud</title><link>http://mobile.wnd.com/2012/11/gop-legally-barred-from-fighting-vote-fraud/#comment-1317150466</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Perhaps the RNC should send funds to the Libertarian Party pursue the case.  This ruling apparently only applies to the RNC.  What about the state Republican party pursuing the issue?  Or a third party, such as the Libertarian Party, could pursue the issue.  The RNC could send funds to such a party. unless, of course the RNC actually supports the DNC at the base, as I suspect is the case.  Else the RNC would have had this nonsense removed years ago.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bill Goode</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2014 14:27:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: GOP legally barred from fighting vote fraud</title><link>http://mobile.wnd.com/2012/11/gop-legally-barred-from-fighting-vote-fraud/#comment-1215078097</link><description>&lt;p&gt;its to get you ready for signing in when you get up in the morning, and provide a swab, a fingerprint and an itinerary on how you are going to further the agenda of the regime, TODAY&amp;gt;&lt;br&gt;where's your hood.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;get thuggies&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Emilio Zapata</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Jan 2014 11:18:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: GOP legally barred from fighting vote fraud</title><link>http://mobile.wnd.com/2012/11/gop-legally-barred-from-fighting-vote-fraud/#comment-1169724573</link><description>&lt;p&gt;why do we have to continually sign in?  This site is more screwed up than king o buma's health B.S.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">airwingjim</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Dec 2013 00:18:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: GOP legally barred from fighting vote fraud</title><link>http://mobile.wnd.com/2012/11/gop-legally-barred-from-fighting-vote-fraud/#comment-1169697559</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This explains why the Democrats have been working steadily to bring in more and more Mexicans. They can ham string efforts to stop voter fraud everywhere they can plant a large number of them.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">NERDWORLD PROBLEMS</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2013 23:40:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: GOP legally barred from fighting vote fraud</title><link>http://mobile.wnd.com/2012/11/gop-legally-barred-from-fighting-vote-fraud/#comment-1119163160</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The weak kneed, yellow bellied, no good for nothin' Republicans are &lt;br&gt;notorious for caving to the Dems, and each time they do, they ruin us &lt;br&gt;for decades to come. If they would have stood their ground and fought &lt;br&gt;for principle back in 82, determined to do what was right, rather than &lt;br&gt;what was easier at the time, we would have a much different climate in our country today. For one thing we would have more honorable people running it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">csh7</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 12 Nov 2013 02:36:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: GOP legally barred from fighting vote fraud</title><link>http://mobile.wnd.com/2012/11/gop-legally-barred-from-fighting-vote-fraud/#comment-947647530</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Important, please read this. GOP Legally Barred from Fighting Vote Fraud&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Bob Unruh, WND, November 20, 2012&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Voting machines suspiciously defaulting to Barack Obama? Buses loaded with strangers appearing at polling stations? Even ballots turning out 100 percent for one candidate in precinct reports?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In short, suspicions of vote fraud?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;That’s too bad, because a race-based consent decree negotiated by Democrats against the Republican National Committee a generation ago still has tied the RNC’s hands, and GOP officials could be cited for contempt—or worse—if they try to make sure American elections are clean.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Impossible?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;No. Fact.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The case is the Democratic National Committee vs. the Republican National Committee, originally from 1982.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Democrats alleged Republicans were trying intimidate minority voters in New Jersey and brought the legal action. The RNC, inexplicably, decided to agree to a consent decree before a Democrat-appointed judge rather than fight the claims.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The judge, Dickinson Debevoise, appointed by Jimmy Carter, later retired but decided he would continue to control the case. The decision requires the RNC—but not the DNC—to “refrain from undertaking any ballot security activities in polling places or election districts where the racial or ethnic composition of such districts is a factor in the decision to conduct, or the actual conduct of, such activities there and where a purpose or significant effect of such activities is to deter qualified voters from voting; and the conduct of such activities disproportionately in or directed toward districts that have a substantial proportion of racial or ethnic populations shall be considered relevant evidence of the existence of such a factor and purpose.”&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The rest of the agreement essentially requires the RNC to follow applicable state and federal election laws.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But the section cited above has been used for decades to warn off Republicans from any challenge to evidence of voter fraud in districts with “racial or ethnic populations.”&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The law has remained, even though the RNC recently challenged it at the appellate level only to be turned down by Judges Joseph Greenaway Jr., appointed by Bill Clinton; Dolores Sloviter, appointed by Carter; and Walter Stapleton, appointed by Ronald Reagan, in the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It now is pending before the U.S. Supreme Court.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;{snip}&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Republicans have tried to change the decree since 2009, after Obama took office. But Debevoise has ruled that they failed to show that conditions in the U.S. had changed since 1982.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Debevoise said that since most minority voters support Democrats, the RNC still has an incentive to suppress minority votes.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;He dismissed the idea of voter fraud and extended his own supervision of the case until 2017.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In March, the 3rd Circuit issued its affirmation of Debevoise’s decision.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;WND recently has reported on allegations of voter fraud, including a claim by a poll watcher in Pennsylvania who said votes reverted to Obama by default, no matter who the voter selected.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The incident took place in the state where officials claimed Obama received a total of 19,605 votes in 59 voting divisions to zero for Mitt Romney and not far from the 100 precincts in Ohio in which Obama got 99 percent of the vote.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;With evidence mounting that the vote tabulation did not reflect the true choices of voters, talk-radio icon Rush Limbaugh declared: “Third-world, tin-horn dictators don’t get [these percentages]. I mean, the last guy that got this percentage of the vote was Saddam Hussein, and the people that didn’t vote for him got shot. This just doesn’t happen. Even Hugo Chavez [of Venezuela] doesn’t get 100 percent or 99 percent of the vote.”&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;{snip}&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Original Article&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">JackHotchkiss</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2013 01:44:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: GOP legally barred from fighting vote fraud</title><link>http://mobile.wnd.com/2012/11/gop-legally-barred-from-fighting-vote-fraud/#comment-925407303</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Stalin said, "I care not who gets to vote as long as I control who gets to count the votes."&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bruce_baker</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 Jun 2013 15:00:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: GOP legally barred from fighting vote fraud</title><link>http://mobile.wnd.com/2012/11/gop-legally-barred-from-fighting-vote-fraud/#comment-805827750</link><description>&lt;p&gt;OWW and Guess what 'they' (the CONSERVATIVE supreme court) upheld this decision AGAIN last month, solely because of the way the GOP has utterly abused the process in the past by blatant voter intimidation and on to the extreme, deliberate, and obvious focus on certain Democratic instances of registration errors and of possible voter fraud; While Republican occurrences of the same ilk, surprise surprise, go totally under their radar! The complete disregard for any sort of true "Election Fairness" which also happens to be the disingenuous guise of their argument is saddening and contemptible. In fact they are working diligently to turn that principle of 'fairness' on its head! Anyone that has a shred of intelligence and is willing to be HONEST here about the basis for this judicial conclusion knows that the real goal of most of these measures put in place by GOP legislators are there to disenfranchise certain voters and keep an old, largely white party relevant... PERIOD!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.politico.com/blogs/under-the-radar/2013/01/scotus-wont-disturb-gop-voter-fraud-decree-154135.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.politico.com/blogs/under-the-radar/2013/01/scotus-wont-disturb-gop-voter-fraud-decree-154135.html"&gt;http://www.politico.com/blo...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">GreyTreed</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2013 11:44:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: GOP legally barred from fighting vote fraud</title><link>http://mobile.wnd.com/2012/11/gop-legally-barred-from-fighting-vote-fraud/#comment-754017775</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That's right.  If we abolish the GOP and start a new conservative party that ruling has no effect.  There are ways around this.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">limdog</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2013 23:13:56 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>